<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wonderful Wanda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rubbercityreview.com/2010/04/wanda-jackson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rubbercityreview.com/2010/04/wanda-jackson/</link>
	<description>Digital Notes from an Analog Mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:08:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin swan</title>
		<link>http://rubbercityreview.com/2010/04/wanda-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-48829</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rubbercityreview.com/?p=4869#comment-48829</guid>
		<description>I think that is Joe Maphis on &quot;Hard-Headed Woman.&quot;  He&#039;s playing the double-neck Mosrite &quot;six and six&quot; with the upper neck set for an octave higher.  One seriously quirky axe.  Damn fast picker, boy howdy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is Joe Maphis on &#8220;Hard-Headed Woman.&#8221;  He&#8217;s playing the double-neck Mosrite &#8220;six and six&#8221; with the upper neck set for an octave higher.  One seriously quirky axe.  Damn fast picker, boy howdy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://rubbercityreview.com/2010/04/wanda-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-48789</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rubbercityreview.com/?p=4869#comment-48789</guid>
		<description>I agree -- let others buy it like I did... I&#039;ll probably pick up the rest of it too. And I&#039;ll blame the good folks at Ace Records for steering me wrong on the spelling (if I were an expert, I&#039;d be referencing first pressing of single number blah-blah-blah instead of crediting the Brits!), which is now fixed on my site. Thanks for setting me straight on that one. But you&#039;re wrong about my expectations -- I had no reason to think the single would be anything less than great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8212; let others buy it like I did&#8230; I&#8217;ll probably pick up the rest of it too. And I&#8217;ll blame the good folks at Ace Records for steering me wrong on the spelling (if I were an expert, I&#8217;d be referencing first pressing of single number blah-blah-blah instead of crediting the Brits!), which is now fixed on my site. Thanks for setting me straight on that one. But you&#8217;re wrong about my expectations &#8212; I had no reason to think the single would be anything less than great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ummmm</title>
		<link>http://rubbercityreview.com/2010/04/wanda-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-48788</link>
		<dc:creator>Ummmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rubbercityreview.com/?p=4869#comment-48788</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s actually called &quot;Funnel of Love&quot;.  Mr. Expert on Wanda Jackson Music.  I don&#039;t buy the fact that you wanted to like the single before you listened to it, it sounds like you wanted to dislike it before you heard a single note played.  What did you expect from a song like &quot;You Know I&#039;m No Good&quot;? How could you possibly re-arrange that song? Make it different? Wanda does a totally different job on it than Amy... and musically speaking it&#039;s quite different if you listen to both of them next to each other.  Same beat...yes... but Amy&#039;s didn&#039;t feature the New Orleans/Big Band ending that Wanda&#039;s cut has... nor great steel guitar on the whole track... etc.

Oh well.  I think anybody reading this should buy the single on iTunes and form their own opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually called &#8220;Funnel of Love&#8221;.  Mr. Expert on Wanda Jackson Music.  I don&#8217;t buy the fact that you wanted to like the single before you listened to it, it sounds like you wanted to dislike it before you heard a single note played.  What did you expect from a song like &#8220;You Know I&#8217;m No Good&#8221;? How could you possibly re-arrange that song? Make it different? Wanda does a totally different job on it than Amy&#8230; and musically speaking it&#8217;s quite different if you listen to both of them next to each other.  Same beat&#8230;yes&#8230; but Amy&#8217;s didn&#8217;t feature the New Orleans/Big Band ending that Wanda&#8217;s cut has&#8230; nor great steel guitar on the whole track&#8230; etc.</p>
<p>Oh well.  I think anybody reading this should buy the single on iTunes and form their own opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

